The pros and cons of mandatory

Then there is also that general understanding of what life in the army is like, what is required of the job, and what has to be done in order to protect the country. In one occasion, a desperate mother of four was once paid USD to mail an unknown package to someone that contained hundreds of grams of crack cocaine, and the judge sentenced her to 10 years in prison, as the law dictated what had to be done even though the judge felt it unjust and irrational.

By requiring a judge to hand out a mandated punishment for a crime, their role becomes quite limited. They require a convicted criminal to serve a sentence of specific length before being eligible for parole or release.

It may not be very effective. With there are strict mandatory sentences in place, it creates an opportunity for prosecutors to look for plea bargaining opportunities. Some of those affected by ADEA exceptions have turned to lawsuits to keep their jobs, reigniting the controversy of age discrimination.

Instead of being an actual judge, mandatory minimum sentences turn them into an administrator. One recent case in Montana involved a teacher who received a day prison sentence for raping a year-old student of his.

This leads us to the question: Acknowledging that airline pilots, federal law enforcement officers and firefighters share the career-ending plight of forced retirement, Sattler stresses: This is true in the justice system just as much as it is with any other state matter.

This, in turn, encourages them to stay on the right side of the law to avoid getting imprisoned for a long time. There are examples of year sentences being handed out for having 1g of marijuana in possession. Instead of the previous sentences of three months and more than a year of being in jail, respectively, the Hammonds were given five years after government prosecutors pushed for harsher punishment for the crime of arson of federal property.

Let us discuss the pros and cons given by supporters and critics about Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Mandatory sentencing is a modern evolution of this justice by requiring judges to issue a specific sentence if someone is found guilty of a crime.

8 Pros and Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Mandatory Minimum Sentences have both benefits and setbacks. Referring to research conducted by the Sloan Center on Aging and Work at Boston College, Mazzella notes that employers increasingly look for ways to hang on to that knowledge by placing older workers in consultant and part-time staffer roles.

There are examples of year sentences being handed out for having 1g of marijuana in possession. Mandatory minimum sentences can surely be unjust. While supporters say that it decreases crime and remove sympathy or bias from the litigation process, opponents argue that it unfairly targets minority groups in the US, destroying families and homes, as well as creating an institution where citizens are more likely to commit crimes in the future.

When a person is intoxicated, there would be a change in his behavior or personality, which can affect his self-control. They can be unjust. Up until the s, capital punishment was a mandatory minimum sentence for murder. What is important is for the justice system to listen to what the community says.

Up until the s, capital punishment was a mandatory minimum sentence for murder.

Pros and Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

The Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences 1. Judges are humans, too, and they can be tempted to award lenient punishments if they know the defendants or if they feel favorably towards them.

It can be used to target specific groups of people. Then there are some judges that do not. List of Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences 1. Citizens are able to understand and develop appreciation for the sacrifices that people in the military made for their country. They stop unjust sentencing practices.

Mandatory vaccines infringe upon constitutionally protected religious freedoms. Several religions oppose vaccines and mandatory vaccinations.

Pros & Cons of Mandatory Community Service Projects Before Graduation From High School

The First Amendment of the US Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.".

Leaders debate the pros and cons of mandatory gym classes in public schools. Learn more about the controversy and whether gym class should be a phenomenon of the past. What Are the Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences?

Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons

1. It shifts the personal bias. Sentencing used to be in the hands of a judge or jury. With mandatory minimum sentences, a guilty verdict means that the prosecutor is in more control of the sentence that offender receives. Leaders debate the pros and cons of mandatory gym classes in public schools.

Learn more about the controversy and whether gym class should be a phenomenon of the past. Gym class is invariably portrayed on the silver screen as a time of awkwardness and embarrassment, when kids have to climb ropes and do a certain number of push-ups in a minute’s time.

The Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences. 1. It limits the role of a judge. Mandatory minimum sentences are mandated by the legislative and executive branches of government, at either the state or national level.

It removes the authority a judge has for sentencing discretion because it treats every convicted person in the same way. There are certain pros and cons of mandatory voting that must be considered when looking at this idea from an outside perspective. List of the Pros of Mandatory Voting. 1. It allows the government to reflect the wishes of the majority.

The pros and cons of mandatory
Rated 4/5 based on 95 review
9 Primary Pros And Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences | ConnectUS